This year91Ƶs budget reveals the federal Liberals envision Canada relying more on its allies for trade in the future, economists and geopolitical experts say 91Ƶ even if that could result in higher prices or missed opportunities.
91ƵIt91Ƶs a reframing,91Ƶ University of British Columbia professor Vina Nadjibulla said after the budget91Ƶs release this week. 91ƵIt91Ƶs essentially saying what we91Ƶve been doing for the last 30 years of engagement is over.91Ƶ
U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen coined the term 91Ƶfriendshoring91Ƶ a year ago, saying allies should rely on each other to make supply chains more resilient, and defang hostile actors from taxing or withholding goods.
The Liberals have sent mixed messages in the past year on the extent to which they agree with that approach. Last October, Industry Minister François-Philippe Champagne said Canada was 91Ƶdecoupling91Ƶ from China, but days later Foreign Affairs Minister Mélanie Joly said she wanted to 91Ƶre-establish ties91Ƶ with Beijing.
The language in the federal budget paints a clearer picture. But some experts warn that the us-versus-them language means Canadian businesses will need to adjust in order to avoid losing out on opportunities with the developing world.
Nadjibulla, speaking at a Wednesday panel held by the Canadian Global Affairs Institute in Ottawa, said Tuesday91Ƶs budget contains the government91Ƶs clearest articulation yet of where the world is now.
91ƵThe language there is that it is a more dangerous world and a more competitive world. And in that world, Canada needs to deepen its connections with its allies,91Ƶ she said.
Specifically, the document says trading with other democracies prevents 91Ƶeconomic extortion91Ƶ and being 91Ƶvulnerable to exploitation91Ƶ by 91Ƶhostile foreign powers91Ƶ who are buying up Canada91Ƶs natural resources.
91ƵDepending on dictatorships for key goods and resources is a major strategic and economic vulnerability,91Ƶ the budget reads, echoing comments U.S. President Joe Biden made during his recent visit to Ottawa.
Nadjibulla, who specializes in international security and the Indo-Pacific region, said the rhetoric marks 91Ƶa big departure from previous budget documents91Ƶ in its frankness.
91ƵEven more so than in the Indo-Pacific strategy, we see the direction of travel,91Ƶ she said.
Mark Warner, a Canadian and American trade lawyer, told a panel that the implementation of 91Ƶfriendshoring91Ƶ is already raising questions from his clients.
The automotive and textile sectors have asked him how much material they can use from China before Washington labels a product made in Canada, Mexico or Guatemala as including Chinese content, he warned.
He said that question is coming up for electronics and will likely affect pharmaceuticals, too.
91ƵThe question of how much Chinese content gets called Canadian is coming,91Ƶ he said. 91ƵIf we91Ƶre seen as being the back door for China, or whatever, that91Ƶs going to be more problematic.91Ƶ
Warner said Canada91Ƶs geography means it will always make sense to rely on Washington, even if Ottawa needs to tweak how it treats other countries under a 91Ƶfriendshoring91Ƶ policy.
91ƵIf the Americans are serious about this, then we really have to figure out our way to be in that (space) in a way that91Ƶs coherent. And that91Ƶs how we91Ƶll protect our manufacturers,91Ƶ he said.
Yet Mary Lovely, an American economist with the Washington-based Peterson Institute, said the U.S. has been inconsistent in listing who actually qualifies as a friend.
91ƵThe U.S. language and the rhetoric can be interpreted in a lot of ways,91Ƶ she said, adding that this goes back to the Trump administration91Ƶs steel and aluminum tariffs on Canada, Europe and Mexico.
91ƵWe saw some confusion in U.S. trade policy over who91Ƶs a quote-unquote friend,91Ƶ she said.
For example, on Friday, the U.S. Treasury Department announced an electric-vehicle tax credit that would apply to goods from Canada, Nicaragua and Oman, but not to those from France and Germany.
Canada is already setting the stage for a cross-border salvo with Washington, announcing in this week91Ƶs budget that Ottawa is considering retaliatory policies if the U.S. doesn91Ƶt stop blocking Canadian companies from certain government contracts and green-tech programs.
Still, Washington has successfully been wedging countries against China, such as with language in the United States-Mexico-Canada free-trade agreement that forbids Canada from signing a trade deal with Beijing without U.S. consent. The same language has appeared in recent agreements with Japan and Taiwan.
Last October, the Biden administration announced sweeping restrictions on China91Ƶs access to semiconductor chips made in any country using U.S. technology, in order to slow Beijing91Ƶs technological and military rise.
Washington is already talking about similar restrictions on biotechnology and quantum tech, Nadjibulla said. She added that this is causing consternation in Southeast Asia, where countries want to maintain economic links with China, Australia, Europe and the world.
But Lovely said many countries are willing to go along with these rules because they crave American investment and a guarantee they won91Ƶt be suddenly frozen out of the world91Ƶs largest economy.
91ƵThey fear coming a closure of the American market, and they want to be on the right side of that door,91Ƶ she said.
Lovely expresses skepticism about governments combining 91Ƶfriendshoring91Ƶ policies with subsidies for their domestic businesses. She said this imposes a necessity to make subsidized companies succeed even when they91Ƶre inefficient, and positions foreign trade as a threat to local firms.
91ƵWe can think of these (partnerships) as secure, like-minded, that speak to our values 91Ƶ however you want. But they are going to be higher-cost,91Ƶ she said.
91ƵWe do need to be aware of the fact that closing markets will lead our own economies to be less competitive on the export side.91Ƶ
She said this will further isolate countries and make it harder to rally global investment to counter climate change.
South Africa91Ƶs high commissioner in Ottawa expressed a similar view.
In an interview, Rieaz Shaik argued that Yellen91Ƶs term lets rich countries divide the world without acknowledging the realities of developing countries and the need to address the climate crisis.
91ƵIt is the most dangerous term in the history of global political relationships, 91Ƶfriendshoring,91Ƶ because it91Ƶs exclusionary. Worse, it says that your non-friend is the other,91Ƶ Shaik said in a wide-ranging interview.
91ƵWe know how apartheid South Africa dealt with the other. They dehumanized us and they removed all our rights to exist. As the other, they could do whatever they want. So I detest 91Ƶfriendshoring.91Ƶ91Ƶ
In any case, Nadir Patel, a senior strategic advisor with Norton Rose Fulbright Canada, said Ottawa91Ƶs simultaneous rhetoric around shoring up trade with allies and developing deeper ties with regions such as Southeast Asia will only come to fruition if corporate Canada follows suit.
91ƵCanadian business needs to step up and do more in other parts of Asia, where we91Ƶre not active,91Ƶ said Patel, a former Canadian high commissioner to India, during the panel.
91ƵBusinesses need to step up and want to leverage that, and not just kick tires once in a while, but really be out there with a presence on a regular basis.91Ƶ
Dylan Robertson, The Canadian Press
Like us on and follow us on .