There once was a man who worked for a city. Let91裸聊视频檚 call him Peter.
Peter91裸聊视频檚 job involved operating an excavator to move dirt around the employer91裸聊视频檚 yard to make topsoil.
The soil arrived at the yard from different areas of the city, including material dredged from ditches, sometimes called 91裸聊视频渄itch slop.91裸聊视频 Then it was composted, compressed into topsoil, and sent out again for other uses.
A week before Halloween, Peter developed flu-like symptoms. He became increasingly unwell.
He was diagnosed with Legionnaire91裸聊视频檚 disease, a form of atypical pneumonia caused by Legionella bacteria. He was in an induced coma for 10 days. After more than three weeks, he was discharged from hospital.
A claim was filed with the Workers91裸聊视频 Compensation Board, operating as WorkSafeBC (WCB).
The claim was accepted.
Initially, the employer did not object to WCB91裸聊视频檚 acceptance of the claim but later, through counsel, it appealed to the Workers91裸聊视频 Compensation Appeal Tribunal (WCAT).
RELATED: Kootnekoff: Drug Impaired Driving in Canada: Who 91裸聊视频榊a Gonna Call?
The issue was whether Peter91裸聊视频檚 Legionnaire91裸聊视频檚 disease was an occupational disease that arose due to the nature of his employment.
If it was, he was covered. If it was not, he would receive no compensation.
A physician at the hospital advised that Peter had most likely contracted his disease at work, given that this type of bacteria is associated with soil and composts.
Peter did not wear protective equipment at work.
He normally worked in machines with enclosed air-conditioned cabs. He washed the equipment with a firehose, and cleaned the filters with compressed air, generally alone at the end of his shift. It was not known whether he used any respiratory protection when cleaning.
His was an isolated case.
The WCAT found that his work involved hand-to-soil contact and exposure to aerosolized water while washing the machines.
Neither party provided any soil samples or filter tests to establish the presence or absence of the problematic bacteria.
Instead, the employer sought to argue that Peter91裸聊视频檚 condition arose not from his employment, but rather from bacteria contracted from the pumpkins he had carved at home.
Peter91裸聊视频檚 family had a tradition every Halloween of carving approximately 100 pumpkins for an annual Halloween display at their home.
In the proceeding, almost every detail of the pumpkin carving process was dissected. The nursery where the pumpkins were purchased. The manner in which Peter91裸聊视频檚 wife brought them home. A subsequent photograph from the nursery that showed pumpkins with dirt stains. The cutting board he used. The wife91裸聊视频檚 Facebook posts. Virtually no stone was left unturned.
RELATED: Kootnekoff: Sexual Harassment at Work
Thankfully for him, Peter wore latex gloves when carving pumpkins. Simply to keep his hands from turning orange and making for easier clean-up. Not because of a fear of bacteria.
In the end, the WCAT found that it was 91裸聊视频渁s likely as not91裸聊视频 that Peter91裸聊视频檚 Legionnaires91裸聊视频 disease was an occupational disease due to the nature of his employment. It denied the employer91裸聊视频檚 appeal.
Can we glean any 91裸聊视频渕orals91裸聊视频 from this story?
Well, one may be that the employer had the onus.
WCB cases involve a unique standard of proof: the 91裸聊视频渁s likely as not91裸聊视频 standard. Under the Workers91裸聊视频 Compensation Act (B.C.), if the evidence supporting different findings on an issue is evenly weighted, the WCB must resolve that issue in a manner that favours the worker.
So, employers, if you wish to challenge WCB claims, be aware of this standard. If the worker91裸聊视频檚 claims are 91裸聊视频渁s likely as not91裸聊视频, the worker will normally prevail. Have your ducks in a row as early as possible.
At the same time, employees should not be smug. WCB matters can be complex, due in no small part to medical issues, legal issues, and a vast array of ever changing policies and guidelines.
In the meantime, we should all be mindful and safe, both at work and in our personal activities, whether they be pumpkin related or not.
The content of this article is intended to provide very general thoughts and general information, not to provide legal advice. Specialist advice from a qualified legal professional should be sought about your specific circumstances. If you would like to reach us, we may be reached at 250-764-7710 or info@inspirelaw.ca . Check out our website, www.inspirelaw.ca.
To report a typo, email:
newstips@kelownacapnews.com.
newstips@kelownacapnews.com
Like us on and follow us on .