Hurricane Otis turned from mild to monster in record time, and scientists are struggling to figure out how 91Ƶ and why they didn91Ƶt see it coming.
Usually reliable computer models and the forecasters who use them didn91Ƶt predict Otis91Ƶ explosive intensification, creating a nightmare scenario of an unexpectedly strong storm striking at night. At least 27 people are dead and four missing in the destruction along Mexico91Ƶs Pacific coast, with devastation that extends for miles.
All this after Acapulco was told to expect a tropical storm just below hurricane strength. Just 24 hours later, Otis blasted ashore with 165 mph (266 kph) winds, the strongest landfall of any East Pacific hurricane.
In just 12 hours, Otis91Ƶ strength more than doubled from 70 mph (113 kph) winds to 160 mph (257 kph), also a record, as it neared the coast. And it got even stronger before it struck. Storms typically gain or lose a few miles per hour in 12 hours, though some outliers gain 30 to 50 mph (48 to 80 kph) in a day.
What happened with Otis was just plain nuts, said University of Miami hurricane researcher Brian McNoldy. But it coincides with a documented trend of because of warmer water connected to , scientists said.
Five different hurricane experts told The Associated Press they weren91Ƶt quite sure what set Otis off and why it wasn91Ƶt predicted, especially since meteorologists have been dramatically improving their intensity forecasts in recent years.
91ƵThe models completely blew it,91Ƶ said MIT atmospheric sciences professor Kerry Emanuel, a hurricane expert.
Experts point to lack of data on the storm and its surroundings and just not completely understanding what makes a storm act like it91Ƶs on steroids.
And it really matters because in Otis91Ƶ case, the storm was coming ashore when it muscled up.
91ƵIt91Ƶs one thing to have a Category 5 hurricane make landfall somewhere when you91Ƶre expecting it,91Ƶ McNoldy said. 91ƵBut to have it happen when you91Ƶre not expecting anything to happen is truly a nightmare.91Ƶ
For example, McNoldy, who lives in Miami, said a tropical storm forecast would prompt him to 91Ƶdo things like move some lightweight furniture in and take down wind chimes and things like that. That91Ƶs about it. You91Ƶre not preparing for a Category 5 hurricane.91Ƶ
National Hurricane Center Director Michael Brennan said 91Ƶthat91Ƶs a very bad scenario, populated area, rapid intensification very close to landfall, a change in the expectations about the impacts that91Ƶs happening on a time scale that doesn91Ƶt give people a lot of time to respond.91Ƶ
Brennan said Otis91Ƶ unforeseen buildup was because 91Ƶit found a much more favorable environment than we were anticipating.91Ƶ He said one part was warm water, another was that the winds 91Ƶ moving in the right direction and at the right altitude 91Ƶ allowed a somewhat raggedy storm to rapidly develop structure and strengthen.
McNoldy said there may be a mystery ingredient that scientists just don91Ƶt know right now, but water is key.
Warm water is fuel for hurricanes. Hot, deep water is like an all-you-can-eat buffet.
Globally, the world91Ƶs oceans have been setting monthly surface heat records since April. The surface waters off the Mexican coast were warm but 91Ƶnot crazy warm,91Ƶ said University at Albany atmospheric scientist Kristen Corbosiero. Bennan and McNoldy said those waters were maybe 1 or 2 degrees above normal.
Below that, the water was much hotter than usual 91Ƶand there91Ƶs just a ton of fuel out there right now,91Ƶ McNoldy said. Still, the storm didn91Ƶt linger and feed on that, which would be expected in rapid intensification, Brennan said.
The heat content in the deeper ocean worldwide has been It91Ƶs from human-caused climate change, McNoldy and other scientists said, as the oceans act as a sponge to absorb a lot of the excess heat caused by the burning of coal, oil and gas.
Otis and two other historically explosive cases of rapid intensification 91Ƶ Patricia in 2015 and Wilma in 2005 91Ƶ all happened in the same mid- to late-October time frame, when deeper water and ocean heat content is at its highest, McNoldy said.
Numerous studies have shown globally that there are than there used to be. An official definition of rapid intensification is a gain in strength of 35 mph (56 kph) in 24 hours. , many of them just before smacking land. In 2017, two devastating hurricanes, Harvey and Maria, rapidly intensified. Last month in the Atlantic, Hurricane Lee rapidly intensified from 80 mph (129 kph) to 155 mph (249 kph), but didn91Ƶt hit anywhere.
91ƵWe91Ƶre seeing so many more cases of these just astonishing rapid intensification events,91Ƶ said former National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration hurricane and climate scientist Jim Kossin, now with the First Street Foundation.
Kossin said that there91Ƶs evidence that what91Ƶs happening globally over a longer time frame is due in part to human-caused climate change but it91Ƶs hard to say that about an individual storm.
But, he added, 91Ƶthis is exactly the kind of thing we would expect to find as the climate warms.91Ƶ
MIT91Ƶs Emanuel said it might be more than just the water91Ƶs temperature, but its low salinity, too. Water in that area at this time of year is fresher from heavy rains at the surface, and that changes the mix of water temperature, he said. Normally a hurricane mixes the warm water on the surface with cooler water below. But when the surface water is fresher, a storm pulls up even more hot water from below, which feeds the storm more 91Ƶand before you know it, you91Ƶre in hot water,91Ƶ Emanuel said.
One key test of that theory is whether Otis leaves warm water in its wake. Usually, hurricanes leave behind cold water. Emanuel hopes satellite images will show it, but it91Ƶs not certain whether they91Ƶll get the right view.
Another factor that Brennan and others mention is that perhaps forecasters underestimated Otis91Ƶ original strength. That would mean it didn91Ƶt intensify as much as it appears because it was stronger to begin with.
91ƵThe East Pacific in a lot of ways is a huge data void,91Ƶ Brennan said. 91ƵThere91Ƶs no buoys. There91Ƶs very few land observations. There91Ƶs no radars along the west coast of Mexico. So we91Ƶre really reliant almost entirely on satellite imagery.91Ƶ
And sometimes satellites, looking at a storm from high above, cannot get an accurate picture of what91Ƶs going on.
Think of it like a jigsaw puzzle and forecasters at times have only 10% of the pieces, Brennan said.
Forecasters have far more tools to see what91Ƶs happening in Atlantic storms, he said.
___
Read more of AP91Ƶs climate coverage at
___
Follow Seth Borenstein on X, formerly known as Twitter at
___
Associated Press climate and environmental coverage receives support from several private foundations. See more about AP91Ƶs climate initiative The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Seth Borenstein, The Associated Press