A Federal Court judge has dismissed an appeal by a 91Ƶdeeply religious91Ƶ British Columbia health executive who said he was wrongfully denied employment insurance after being fired three years ago for refusing to get the COVID-19 vaccine.
Darold Sturgeon was fired as executive director of medical affairs for Interior Health in November 2021 after refusing to get the vaccine based on his Christian beliefs.
He applied for employment insurance benefits but was denied due to being fired for 91Ƶmisconduct,91Ƶ with appeals to two levels of the Social Security Tribunal also failing, leading him to seek a judicial review in Federal Court in August 2023.
The ruling says Sturgeon believed the tribunal should have examined his assertion under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms that the term 91Ƶmisconduct91Ƶ did not apply to his case 91Ƶbecause he was exercising his freedom of religion.91Ƶ
Justice William Pentney found that 91Ƶrecent, abundant and unanimous case law91Ƶ defined a specific and narrow role for the tribunal91Ƶs appeal divisions, focusing on an employee91Ƶs conduct, and not justification for an employer91Ƶs policies or compliance with the Charter.
Sturgeon91Ƶs appeal fell 91Ƶoutside the mandate91Ƶ of the tribunal and he could have challenged Interior Health91Ƶs mandatory vaccine policy 91Ƶthrough other avenues,91Ƶ the judge ruled.
Pentney said those included advancing a Charter claim, lodging a wrongful dismissal suit or labour grievance, or complaining to the 91ƵBritish Columbia Human Rights Commission.91Ƶ The office of the British Columbia Human Rights Commissioner separately clarified that such a complaint would have to be lodged with the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal.
91ƵThe point is, there were other avenues available to pursue the Charter question; this decision does not cut off the only avenue of relief,91Ƶ the ruling says.
Sturgeon said in an interview Tuesday that he was 91Ƶactually quite concerned that the judiciary or the judicial system has not been able to protect my Charter rights.91Ƶ
He said finding a lawyer to represent him was too costly for the small amount of money the benefits would91Ƶve offered because he found a new job about five months after being fired.
91ƵI91Ƶm basically doing this for the underdog, for those that are not able to fight the system or to defend their own charter rights,91Ƶ he said. 91ƵAnd so I took it upon myself to almost do this as a hobby, to learn the law, to represent myself and to plead my case.91Ƶ
Sturgeon said the process was stacked with multiple layers of submissions, denials and reconsiderations before making it before the court. Where he went wrong, he said, was that his Charter challenge was only brought up 91Ƶindirectly91Ƶ and he didn91Ƶt 91Ƶfully outline91Ƶ it while before the tribunal91Ƶs appeal division.
He said he was following his 91Ƶmoral conscience91Ƶ as a devout Roman Catholic to refuse the vaccine over the use of fetal cells in its development, and he didn91Ƶt think 91Ƶmisconduct91Ƶ applied in his case. He said he was an administrative employee who worked remotely.
Sturgeon said he doesn91Ƶt know if appealing the decision would be worth it given tight deadlines to file, but cases similar to his were going to the Federal Court of Appeal.
91ƵI think they will fight the good fight and, and try to see if somebody gets justice and truth out there,91Ƶ he said. 91ƵI don91Ƶt blame my employer for implementing what they thought at the time was the right thing.91Ƶ
The judge found that 91Ƶno one has doubted that (Sturgeon) acted based on his understanding of his religious obligations,91Ƶ and that he had 91Ƶably advanced his arguments.91Ƶ
91ƵHowever, despite his sincere and thoughtful arguments, the binding jurisprudence requires that I find against him,91Ƶ the ruling says.
Sturgeon said he knew other workers who were fired for the same reason, and noted it was 91Ƶextremely costly91Ƶ to hire a lawyer and 91Ƶextremely time consuming91Ƶ to go it alone.
91ƵI was in a leadership position at Interior Health and I was aware of staff like a single mom that has children in a mobile home that lost her job because of this decision and she received no severance, just like me, and she received no employment insurance,91Ƶ he said.
91ƵShe has no voice. She lost all her benefits at Interior Health and she had no voice. So who91Ƶs going to fight for her?91Ƶ