It could be months for a court decision to be delivered as part of the ongoing efforts to build a year-round ski resort in the southeastern corner of the province.
Arguments wrapped up last week in Vancouver Supreme Court between Glacier Resorts Ltd and the provincial government, as the resort development company is seeking to quash a government decision in 2015 that ground the project to a halt.
Mary Polak, then the Minister of Environment at the time, ruled that the project was not substantially started, which meant an Environmental Assessment Certificate expired and therefore stopping any and all development of the resort, which is located in the Jumbo Glacier valley near Invermere.
Glacier Resorts Ltd launched a challenge to the decision soon after Polak91裸聊视频檚 decision was released.
Tom Oberti, vice president of Pheidias Group 91裸聊视频� the design consultants for the project 91裸聊视频� says the pending court ruling is important because it will provide clarity going forward.
91裸聊视频淚t91裸聊视频檚 the difference between a project that is 6,000 beds91裸聊视频r a project that would have to be done under the threshold of the Environmental Assessment Act, and that would mean a project that has 2,000 or less beds.
91裸聊视频淪o obviously there are implications there on what kind of project would be built.91裸聊视频�
The resort full build-out plan includes 5,500 bed-units (plus 750 beds for staff accommodations) in a 110-hectare resort base area that could include 20-23 ski lifts.
Glacier Resorts Ltd. argues in their court filing that the province demanded a standart that was impossible to obtain, given regulatory and physical constrants.
Local environmental groups, including Wildsight and the Jumbo Creek Conservation Society successfully gained intervenor status in May.
The two groups are concerned about the substantially started decision being quashed, but also with the decision itself and allege that some of the construction at the resort site was in non-compliance, according to their court filing.
91裸聊视频淲hile the Decision (sic) found that the project had not substantially started, the applicants are concerned that these proceedings could lead to the Court quashing the decision, allowing the project to proceed nearly 14 years after the issuance of the EAC,91裸聊视频� reads the filing on behalf of Jumbo Creek Conservation Society and Wildsight.
91裸聊视频淎lternatively, if the Decision is upheld on the basis of an overly generous interpretation of the [Environmental Assessment] Act, it would set a bad precedent that could undermine the effectiveness of the environmental assessment regime and allow other multi-phased projects to circumvent deadlines by obtaining an indefinite right to proceed based on minimal construction.91裸聊视频�
Robyn Duncan, the executive director for Wildsight, says it was important for both groups to intervene into the case.
91裸聊视频淚 think we91裸聊视频檝e been working on this issue for a couple of decades now. It was such a momentous decision to see the environmental certificate cancelled when it was the right decision,91裸聊视频� Duncan said. 91裸聊视频淎nd to be able to intervene in that court case and support that decision meant a lot to us; to be able to carry those facts forward and add argument to that case.91裸聊视频�
The issue of building a resort in the area dates back almost 30 years.
Running parallel to the substantially started decision was a court challenge from the Ktunaxa Nation Council, which argued that they were not adequately consulted by the province when the project91裸聊视频檚 Master Development Plan was approved.
That court dispute went all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada, which dismissed their appeal.
While the Ktunaxa said they were not adequately consulted by the province, they also argued that the construction of a resort would violate their religious freedoms, as the area 91裸聊视频� known as Qat91裸聊视频檓uk 91裸聊视频� is in a spiritually sensitive area home to the Grizzly Bear Spirit.
