91Ƶ

Skip to content

Kelowna court case just one of hundreds across Canada halted by time limits

Jordan ruling imposes 18-month 91Ƶpresumptive ceiling91Ƶ between charge, end of trial in provincial court
web1_2024110719118-20241106181112-7c8da2344ef6a0ed00d8fbe673507205e6670129d9316ec8b8b626cbe1812fb0
Cait Alexander, Founder of End Violence Everywhere, poses for a portrait after appearing as a witness at a House of Commons standing committee the Status of Women (FEWO) in Ottawa on Monday, Oct. 28, 2024. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick

When police turned up at Melanie Hatton91Ƶs home in Kelowna, B.C., in November 2021, she says they found her in the bathroom covered in blood, with her then-husband Jeffrey Maclean standing over her 91Ƶin an aggressive manner.91Ƶ

She describes a gruesome scene in a court filing, with blood from her head wound allegedly smeared on Maclean91Ƶs mouth from his whispering in her ear. The filing in a civil lawsuit against Maclean says he told a 911 operator his wife was 91Ƶbleeding like a pig.91Ƶ

Hatton said police and prosecutors told her that the criminal case against Maclean in B.C. Supreme Court would be a 91Ƶslam dunk,91Ƶ and he was charged with assault causing bodily harm and resisting arrest.

But the case was thrown out in August 2023 91Ƶ not for a lack of evidence, but because the Crown took too long to bring it to trial under a set of strict timelines that have reshaped the way criminal cases are handled since a landmark 2016 ruling by the Supreme Court of Canada.

READ MORE:

Supporters say the so-called Jordan ruling has sped up proceedings and strengthened Charter rights for prompt justice.

But the legacy of Jordan is mixed, and some victims say the time limits work in criminals91Ƶ favour. Eight years into the rules, cases continue to collapse because the time limits are breached, although these represent a small fraction of all cases.

A review of statistics provided by provinces and territories shows that since the beginning of last year, more than 400 criminal cases countrywide have been dismissed, stayed or withdrawn as a result of Jordan challenges.

Among the defendants were some accused of sexual assault, child exploitation, fraud and drug trafficking; murder cases have also been thrown out in previous years.

The case against Maclean was among those dropped.

Hatton said she was thrown into 91Ƶan absolute pit of despair and shame91Ƶ after the case was thrown out.

Prosecutors blamed factors including COVID-19 and the availability of Maclean91Ƶs lawyer for the delays and the failure of the case.

Hatton thought otherwise, and sent a one-line email to the Crown prosecutor.

91ƵI said 91Ƶthis is on you,91Ƶ91Ƶ said Hatton, who now lives in Ontario with the couple91Ƶs two children.

None of the allegations in Hatton91Ƶs civil suit against Maclean have been proven or tested in court, and in his response, Maclean 91Ƶdenies each and every allegation.91Ƶ

A 91ƵREVOLUTIONARY91Ƶ RULING

The Jordan ruling imposed 91Ƶa presumptive ceiling91Ƶ of 18 months between charge and the actual or anticipated end of a trial in provincial court, and 30 months in superior courts.

Barring 91Ƶexceptional circumstances,91Ƶ exceeding those limits was deemed by the country91Ƶs top court to breach the Canadian Charter, which requires that criminal defendants 91Ƶbe tried within a reasonable time.91Ƶ

Exactly how long 91Ƶreasonable91Ƶ meant was unclear until the high court91Ƶs ruling in R. V. Jordan.

The case would upend criminal law practice countrywide, but B.C. lawyer Tony Paisana, who was involved in the trial, didn91Ƶt know just how significant it would be at the time.

91ƵLooking back, it91Ƶs certainly difficult to say that we, any of us, really expected this to come out the way that it did and how revolutionary it was going to be,91Ƶ he said in an interview.

The case started modestly enough in December 2008 with the arrest of an alleged drug dealer named Barrett Jordan in Langley, B.C., along with a number of others who police accused of running a 91Ƶdial-a-dope91Ƶ operation.

It took more than four years from Jordan being charged to the end of his original trial.

He unsuccessfully argued that his Charter rights to a timely trial had been breached in both the B.C. Supreme Court and Court of Appeal before it ended up in the Supreme Court of Canada.

Paisana and colleagues Eric Gottardi and Richard Peck argued that the right to a timely trial went back hundreds of years, quoting the 1215 Magna Carta in their submissions.

Paisana said the high court91Ƶs decision in Jordan 91Ƶcompletely achieved its intended objective, which was to speed up criminal trials.91Ƶ

91ƵAnd to have various judicial participants, that being the judge, the Crown, the defence, the accused, everyone start paying attention to the timeliness of trials,91Ƶ he said.

91ƵIt was a chronic problem that existed in our system and Jordan was what we call in the law a 91Ƶclarion call91Ƶ to change the culture that surrounded criminal trials.91Ƶ

He said cases were stayed for unreasonable delays before this case, but Jordan established new thresholds.

91ƵThere91Ƶs just a greater confidence in the justice system when things are resolved more quickly,91Ƶ he said. 91ƵI think it91Ƶs a net positive effect that the judgment91Ƶs had. It91Ƶs not without its controversy, but nothing that we do is without its controversy, frankly.91Ƶ

The debate over Jordan was reignited in B.C. this summer, after a case was dismissed against a man accused of molesting a six-year-old.

Premier David Eby said at the time it was due to a 91Ƶperfect storm91Ƶ of delays, and that 91Ƶnot one case should be dismissed this way.91Ƶ

The Jordan deadlines, he said, had been 91Ƶvery restrictive91Ƶ and 91Ƶdevastating in other provinces.91Ƶ

Among at least 409 Jordan challenges that ended cases across Canada since the start of last year were 26 in B.C., involving allegations ranging from fraud, to theft, drug and weapons offences, and sexual assault.

91ƵEvery case that is judicially stayed due to delay is a concern. Victims and the public expect to see cases determined on their merits and not dismissed because of unreasonable delay,91Ƶ the B.C. Ministry of Attorney General said in a statement.

91ƵWe have taken this issue seriously and invested in transforming processes and increasing resources to prevent judicial stays,91Ƶ the statement said.

In Maclean91Ƶs case, the B.C. Supreme Court found in August 2023 that his trial had been set 91Ƶwell beyond the Jordan limits,91Ƶ through no fault of the defence, nor any delay caused by COVID-19 interruptions of court operations.

91ƵIf the Crown had not failed in its disclosure obligations,91Ƶ the judge wrote, 91Ƶthe matter would have likely concluded within the Jordan limits.91Ƶ

91ƵA HUGE NEGATIVE IMPACT91Ƶ

Stacey Purser, a criminal defence lawyer in Edmonton, said Jordan had not resulted in the 91Ƶculture of urgency that I think the Supreme Court was trying to create.91Ƶ

91ƵUnfortunately, I don91Ƶt think that much really has changed since Jordan other than to say that, you know, once you get past those presumptive deadlines, people seem to be in quite a panic to get things done,91Ƶ she said.

Vancouver defence lawyer Kyla Lee, who specializes in impaired driving cases, said Jordan has had a 91Ƶhuge negative impact on not just my practice, but the practice of law generally for criminal lawyers.91Ƶ

91ƵThe problem is that now every time you go to court, no matter what the purpose of the appearance is, there is always a discussion about Jordan,91Ƶ she said. 91ƵIt comes up at every single appearance and it91Ƶs gotten to the point where the ceilings in Jordan are effectively being weaponized against accused individuals.91Ƶ

With a busy schedule, finding court dates that work for both her and prosecutors is challenging, and the inability to agree results in arguments over who91Ƶs to blame. Judges have to conduct 91Ƶmicroscopic analysis91Ƶ to determine the length and cause of trial delays, Lee said.

91ƵIt has made everything far more complex, far more contentious, and it91Ƶs really done a disservice to the timely administration of justice because more court time is being taken up simply to address these issues,91Ƶ she said.

Former Toronto resident Cait Alexander, a Canadian model and actress now living in Los Angeles, founded the group End Violence Everywhere after an abusive relationship nearly ended her life, alleging her ex-partner brutally beat her with a wooden rolling pin in July 2021.

Multiple charges were stayed due to delays, and Alexander said she felt 91Ƶdisgusting91Ƶ after having received assurances from prosecutors that the case would go ahead.

She said the only consequence against her ex-boyfriend 91Ƶ who was originally charged with assault causing bodily harm, uttering threats, obstruction and other offences 91Ƶ was a peace bond, and she left the country in fear of her safety.

91ƵThat91Ƶs all they could offer me because they didn91Ƶt have time to prosecute my case,91Ƶ she said.

Alexander testified before the House of Commons Standing Committee on the Status of Women this past July, recounting stories of survivors including Hatton, whose experience she called 91Ƶharrowingly similar91Ƶ to her own.

In her testimony, Alexander told members of the committee that the 91Ƶgovernment doesn91Ƶt care91Ƶ about survivors and victims of intimate partner violence.

91ƵWe, as Canadians, have Charter rights that are essentially a 91Ƶget out of jail free91Ƶ card for criminals, but what about survivors91Ƶ rights? Why are our Charter rights never accounted for?,91Ƶ she testified.

Like Hatton, she91Ƶs suing her ex-boyfriend because it91Ƶs 91Ƶthe only form of legal justice I have left,91Ƶ she told the committee.

Alexander testified to the committee again last week, telling members that Jordan timelines shouldn91Ƶt apply in cases of sexual assault or intimate partner violence.

91ƵThere should be no time limit or stay permitted with human-on-human crimes,91Ƶ she testified, later tearfully describing the Jordan rules as 91Ƶsickening91Ƶ and 91Ƶterrifying.91Ƶ

Paisana said it was important to keep in mind the 91Ƶbigger picture91Ƶ of Jordan, the importance of timely trials and the rights of accused persons who are presumed innocent until proven guilty.

91ƵIt benefits society as a whole in a very dramatic way, as opposed to one or two individual cases in a given a year, in a given jurisdiction, that might be stayed as a result of it,91Ƶ he said.

For Hatton, the collapse of the case against her ex-husband was devastating, and continues to influence her life. She now has multiple security systems in her new home after fleeing her old life in B.C.

In October 2023, Hatton filed her civil lawsuit against Maclean in B.C. Supreme Court, alleging a 91Ƶhistory of abuse91Ƶ throughout their relationship, seeking damages for assault, intentional infliction of emotional distress and defamation.

READ MORE: Kelowna woman files lawsuit after 17 years of alleged abuse

READ MORE:

She said getting a relocation order allowing her to move out of B.C. with her children is a 91Ƶslight bit of justice.91Ƶ

But she now lives in a state of hyper vigilance.

91ƵI sleep with a golf club beside my bed,91Ƶ she said.

Darryl Greer, The Canadian Press

Breaking News You Need To Know

Sign up for free account today and start receiving our exclusive newsletters.

Sign Up with google Sign Up with facebook

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google and apply.

Reset your password

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google and apply.

A link has been emailed to you - check your inbox.



Don't have an account? Click here to sign up




(or

91Ƶ

) document.head.appendChild(flippScript); window.flippxp = window.flippxp || {run: []}; window.flippxp.run.push(function() { window.flippxp.registerSlot("#flipp-ux-slot-ssdaw212", "Black Press Media Standard", 1281409, [312035]); }); }