Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer and NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh are calling for an ethics probe into allegations the Prime Minister91Ƶs Office pressured former attorney general Jody Wilson-Raybould to help SNC-Lavalin avoid a criminal prosecution.
Conservatives on the House of Commons justice committee, along with the New Democrats, will also force an emergency meeting to consider a motion calling on nine high-ranking government officials to testify on it, Scheer said.
The list includes Wilson-Raybould herself, Justice Minister David Lametti, the prime minister91Ƶs chief of staff Katie Telford and the prime minister91Ƶs principal secretary Gerald Butts.
The prime minister should have nothing to fear from an independent investigation by the federal ethics commissioner, Singh said separately.
The Globe and Mail reported Thursday that Wilson-Raybould was demoted in a cabinet shuffle early last month because she wouldn91Ƶt intervene in the case of SNC-Lavalin.
The Quebec engineering and construction giant has been charged with bribery and corruption in a bid to secure government business in Libya and wanted a deal, allowed under the law, to pay reparations rather than be prosecuted.
91ƵIf the prime minister has nothing to hide as he has suggested then he should have no reason to fear these individuals appearing before the justice committee,91Ƶ Scheer said on Parliament Hill. 91ƵMPs have a duty to determine what exactly happened here and Justin Trudeau and his office must be forthcoming.91Ƶ
91ƵAll this cries out for some serious investigation,91Ƶ Singh said in a telephone interview from Burnaby, B.C., where he91Ƶs campaigning for a seat in the House of Commons in a Feb. 25 byelection.
91ƵIf he truly wants to clear this up and believes there91Ƶs been no wrongdoing, he should welcome an investigation from the ethics commissioner. 91Ƶ Tell us what happened, be transparent, invite the ethics commissioner to investigate and tell us that this is not the case or, if it is the case, then there91Ƶs a serious reckoning that needs to happen.91Ƶ
The Globe reported that PMO aides leaned heavily on Wilson-Raybould to persuade the federal director of public prosecutions to negotiate a 91Ƶremediation agreement91Ƶ with SNC-Lavalin as a way of holding it to account for wrongdoing by some of its executives, rather than pursuing a criminal prosecution that could financially hobble the company.
SNC-Lavalin was charged in 2015 by the RCMP and openly called for a remediation agreement to avoid damaging the company, a major employer in Quebec. After lobbying by the company of government officials, including those in the PMO, the government included in its 2018 budget a Criminal Code amendment to allow such agreements to be negotiated in cases of corporate crime, as is done in the United States and the United Kingdom.
During a visit to Vaughan, Ont., on Thursday, Trudeau said the allegations in the newspaper story 91Ƶare false.91Ƶ
91ƵNeither the current nor the previous attorney general was ever directed by me or anyone in my office to take a decision in this matter,91Ƶ he said.
Asked whether he or his office had applied any influence or pressure on the minister, Trudeau repeated they had never directed Wilson-Raybould or Lametti to intervene.
Neither Wilson-Raybould nor SNC-Lavalin has responded to questions from The Canadian Press about the story.
Last October, Kathleen Roussel, the director of public prosecutions informed SNC-Lavalin that negotiating a remediation agreement would be inappropriate in this particular case. Three months later, Wilson-Raybould was moved to the veterans affairs post, a move widely seen as a demotion.
Both Scheer and Singh argue the issue cuts to the heart of our democracy and independent system of justice.
91ƵThe allegations that we are hearing in the last 24 hours are unprecedented,91Ƶ Scheer said.
It appears a corporation that has in the past made illegal donations to the Liberal party, among others, was able to influence the government to the point of changing the law and pressuring the attorney general to interfere with a decision of the public prosecutor, Singh said.
91ƵAt the end of the day, Canadians deserve to have a government on their side, on the side of justice, not on the side of a multinational corporation.91Ƶ
Singh said the allegations suggest there may have been possible violations of three sections of the federal Conflict of Interest Act: the prohibitions against public office holders giving preferential treatment to any individual or organization, using insider information to improperly further a person91Ƶs private interests or seeking to influence a decision to further another person91Ƶs private interests.
On the day Wilson-Raybould was shuffled out of her twin role as justice minister and attorney general, she penned an unprecedented, lengthy missive defending her performance in the job. Among other things, she wrote that 91Ƶit is a pillar of our democracy that our system of justice be free from even the perception of political interference91Ƶ and that, as attorney general, she believed she must be 91Ƶalways willing to speak truth to power.91Ƶ
She has refused to comment on the alleged pressure from PMO to help SNC-Lavalin avoid a criminal trial, telling the Globe and Mail that the matter is 91Ƶbetween me and the government as the government91Ƶs previous lawyer.91Ƶ
That left her successor at Justice, Lametti, to fend off opposition charges Thursday of political interference in the justice system. Lametti said neither he nor Wilson-Raybould were ever directed or pressured to intervene with the director of public prosecutions to drop the prosecution of SNC-Lavalin.
Wilson-Raybould91Ƶs father, Bill Wilson, said in a Facebook post Thursday that his daughter91Ƶs cabinet demotion 91Ƶmakes sense now 91Ƶ ugly political sense.91Ƶ He predicted 91Ƶhistory will prove that she did the right thing.91Ƶ
The attorney general is legally allowed to give directives to the public prosecutor on general issues and on individual cases, provided the directives are in writing and published in the Canada Gazette, the federal register.
The fact that such directives must be done publicly is intended to constrain a justice minister from doing anything overtly political.
Joan Bryden and Kristy Kirkup, The Canadian Press
Like us on and follow us on .