91Ƶ

Skip to content

NFL ordered to pay $4.8B in 91ƵSunday Ticket91Ƶ antitrust case

U.S. ruling covers 2.4 million residential subscribers and 48,000 businesses
web1_2024060606060-6661898fa89ed939dcea101djpeg
FILE - The NFL logo is seen during the NFL Super Bowl 58 football game Sunday, Feb. 11, 2024, in Las Vegas. Opening arguments are expected to begin Thursday, June 6, 2024, in federal court in a class-action lawsuit filed by 91ƵSunday Ticket91Ƶ subscribers claiming the NFL broke antitrust laws. The lawsuit was filed in 2015 and has withstood numerous challenges, including a dismissal that was overturned. (AP Photo/Adam Hunger, File)

A jury in U.S. District Court ordered the NFL to pay nearly $4.8 billion in damages Thursday after ruling that the league violated antitrust laws in distributing out-of-market Sunday afternoon games on a premium subscription service.

The jury awarded $4.7 billion in damages to the residential class and $96 million in damages to the commercial class.

The lawsuit covered 2.4 million residential subscribers and 48,000 businesses who paid for the package of out-of-market games from the 2011 through 2022 seasons on DirecTV. The lawsuit claimed the league broke antitrust laws by selling its package of Sunday games at an inflated price. The subscribers also say the league restricted competition by offering 91ƵSunday Ticket91Ƶ only on a satellite provider.

The NFL said it would appeal the verdict. That appeal would go to the 9th Circuit and then possibly the Supreme Court.

91ƵWe are disappointed with the jury91Ƶs verdict today in the NFL Sunday Ticket class action lawsuit,91Ƶ the league said in a statement. 91ƵWe continue to believe that our media distribution strategy, which features all NFL games broadcast on free over-the-air television in the markets of the participating teams and national distribution of our most popular games, supplemented by many additional choices including RedZone, Sunday Ticket and NFL+, is by far the most fan friendly distribution model in all of sports and entertainment.

91ƵWe will certainly contest this decision as we believe that the class action claims in this case are baseless and without merit.91Ƶ

The jury of five men and three women deliberated for nearly five hours before reaching its decision.

91ƵThis case transcends football. This case matters,91Ƶ plaintiffs attorney Bill Carmody said during Wednesday91Ƶs closing arguments. 91ƵIt91Ƶs about justice. It91Ƶs about telling the 32 team owners who collectively own all the big TV rights, the most popular content in the history of TV 91Ƶ that91Ƶs what they have. It91Ƶs about telling them that even you cannot ignore the antitrust laws. Even you cannot collude to overcharge consumers. Even you can91Ƶt hide the truth and think you91Ƶre going to get away with it.91Ƶ

The league maintained it has the right to sell 91ƵSunday Ticket91Ƶ under its antitrust exemption for broadcasting. The plaintiffs say that only covers over-the-air broadcasts and not pay TV.

DirecTV had 91ƵSunday Ticket91Ƶ from its inception in 1994 through 2022. The league signed a seven-year deal with Google91Ƶs YouTube TV that began with the 2023 season.

The lawsuit was originally filed in 2015 by the Mucky Duck sports bar in San Francisco but was dismissed in 2017. Two years later, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which has jurisdiction over California and eight other states, reinstated the case. Gutierrez ruled last year the case could proceed as a class action.





(or

91Ƶ

) document.head.appendChild(flippScript); window.flippxp = window.flippxp || {run: []}; window.flippxp.run.push(function() { window.flippxp.registerSlot("#flipp-ux-slot-ssdaw212", "Black Press Media Standard", 1281409, [312035]); }); }