A hip-hop superstar beef was cranked up another notch Wednesday when sued Universal Music Group for defamation over rival diss track 91ƵNot Like Us.91Ƶ
The lawsuit, filed in federal court in New York City, alleges UMG 91Ƶ the parent record label for Drake and Lamar 91Ƶ published and promoted the track even though it included false pedophilia allegations against Drake and suggested listeners should resort to vigilante justice. Lamar is not named in the suit.
The result, the suit says, was intruders and two attempted break-ins at Drake91Ƶs Toronto home, online hate and harassment, a hit to his reputation and a decrease in his brand91Ƶs value before his contract renegotiation with UMG this year.
91ƵThe lawsuit is not about the artist who created 91ƵNot Like Us,91Ƶ91Ƶ the lawsuit says, referring to Lamar. 91ƵIt is, instead, entirely about UMG, the music company that decided to publish, promote, exploit, and monetize allegations that it understood were not only false, but dangerous.91Ƶ
The suit later alleges, 91ƵUMG did so because it understood that the Recording91Ƶs inflammatory and shocking allegations were a gold mine.91Ƶ
And, the suit claims, the music company has made large investments and used its connections to arrange for 91ƵNot Like Us91Ƶ to be performed at next month91Ƶs Super Bowl, where Lamar will be
The lawsuit, which is seeking a trial and an undisclosed amount of money for damages, also repeated allegations in other legal filings that UMG on streaming services.
The track is nominated for five Grammys, including record of the year and song of the year.
UMG disputed the lawsuit91Ƶs allegations in a statement Wednesday afternoon.
91ƵNot only are these claims untrue, but the notion that we would seek to harm the reputation of any artist 91Ƶ let alone Drake 91Ƶ is illogical,91Ƶ the company said. 91ƵWe have invested massively in his music and our employees around the world have worked tirelessly for many years to help him achieve historic commercial and personal financial success.91Ƶ
The company added: 91ƵThroughout his career, Drake has intentionally and successfully used UMG to distribute his music and poetry to engage in conventionally outrageous back-and-forth 91Ƶrap battles91Ƶ to express his feelings about other artists. He now seeks to weaponize the legal process to silence an artist91Ƶs creative expression and to seek damages from UMG for distributing that artist91Ƶs music. 91Ƶ
Representatives for Lamar did not respond to emails seeking comment.
between Drake, a 38-year-old Canadian rapper and singer and five-time Grammy winner whose full name is Aubrey Drake Graham, and Lamar, a 37-year-old , is among the biggest in hip-hop in recent years, with two of the genre91Ƶs biggest stars at its center.
The two were occasional collaborators more than a decade ago, but Lamar began taking public jabs at Drake starting in 2013. The fight last year.
Drake91Ƶs lawyers, from New York-based Willkie Farr & Gallagher, said the lawsuit seeks to hold UMG accountable for knowingly promoting false and defamatory allegations against him. They said the shooting and break-in attempts at Drake91Ƶs home, and the online vitriol, prompted him to move his family out of the house, and that he fears for his and their safety.
91ƵBeginning on May 4, 2024 and every day since, UMG has used its massive resources as the world91Ƶs most powerful music company to elevate a dangerous and inflammatory message that was designed to assassinate Drake91Ƶs character, and led to actual violence at Drake91Ƶs doorstep,91Ƶ the law firm said in a statement.
91ƵThis lawsuit reveals the human and business consequences to UMG91Ƶs elevation of profits over the safety and well-being of its artists, and shines a light on the manipulation of artists and the public for corporate gain,91Ƶ it said.