Academy Award-winning actor Jeff Bridges wanted to avoid making a climate change documentary that only preached to the converted 91Ƶ he wanted to reach and speak to people who didn91Ƶt already care about the issue.
That91Ƶs why 91ƵLiving in the Future91Ƶs Past,91Ƶ produced and narrated by Bridges, deliberately avoids heaping guilt upon viewers or hammering them with warnings of impending doom, the 91ƵBig Lebowski91Ƶ star said.
READ MORE:
91ƵI think the fear makes you throw up your hands and feel like it91Ƶs too late, or think it91Ƶs going to trickle down from the government,91Ƶ Bridges, 69, said in an interview.
91ƵBut I don91Ƶt think we can wait for the government to be enlightened with what our scientists are telling us. I think it91Ƶs got to trickle up, if it91Ƶs trickling anywhere. I think we all have to take action.91Ƶ
The film is part of a rising tide of documentaries that aim to wake up viewers to the realities of climate change. But as governments, companies and individuals remain reluctant to act, it91Ƶs fair to question how much of an impact movies can have.
Bridges wanted 91ƵLiving in the Future91Ƶs Past91Ƶ to take a fresh approach. When he first discussed collaborating with director Susan Kucera, he said he felt there were enough climate movies that pointed fingers and told audiences they were in dire straits.
The pair discovered they were interested in why humans as a species were responding the way they were to climate change. As a result, the film interrogates how evolution, history and psychology have shaped our reaction to the unfolding crisis.
Bridges likes to use a metaphor inspired by one of his heroes, Buckminster Fuller, who invented a small rudder called a trim tab that helps turn a larger rudder on a ship. The tab symbolizes how the individual is connected to society, he said.
91ƵWe all can make a huge difference, just like that little rudder on the big rudder,91Ƶ Bridges said. 91ƵWe can all do it in different ways. I91Ƶm in the movie business, so I make movies.91Ƶ
The film showcases a wide range of prominent scientists and authors. Yet one of the most refreshing voices is former Republican congressman Bob Inglis, who argues caring about the environment is not at odds with a conservative or religious identity.
91ƵHe has this idea that if you91Ƶre going to go to a group of people who are self-identified in one way, who better to talk to that group than someone from that group?91Ƶ said Kucera. 91ƵWe91Ƶre still kind of tribal that way, and so that91Ƶs what he does.91Ƶ
The beautifully shot film will screen this week as part of Elements Film Festival at Vancouver91Ƶs Telus World of Science. Also screening are local films including 91ƵCoal Valley91Ƶ and 91ƵPlastic Beach91Ƶ and international features such as 91ƵQueen Without Land.91Ƶ
Carol Linnitt, who co-founded online news outlet The Narwhal and directed 91ƵCoal Valley,91Ƶ said documentaries allow storytellers to delve deeper into an issue and often the outlet91Ƶs films reach an audience far beyond its regular readership.
91ƵWe live in a fast-paced, attention-driven world these days. Often, the dry written word sitting static on a page may not be what91Ƶs going to do it for a lot of people,91Ƶ she said.
Of course, it also matters who sees these films. Bridges said he was excited to be working on a curriculum that would allow his movie to be taught in schools, where it would encourage kids to take action and use their imaginations to solve the problem.
Keith Scholey, series producer of the lush Netflix nature documentary 91ƵOur Planet,91Ƶ said the filmmakers created a website, OurPlanet.com, to give viewers more details about solutions, and they91Ƶre also screening the show for global decision makers.
91ƵSo far, we have been able to present 91ƵOur Planet91Ƶ to the World Economic Forum in Davos and next week will do the same to the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. We think we have already started to bring about change,91Ƶ he said.
Still, humans are so notoriously apathetic about climate change that one environmental psychologist has catalogued all the reasons people don91Ƶt take action. Robert Gifford of the University of Victoria describes them as the 91Ƶdragons of inaction.91Ƶ
91ƵThe less polite word might be excuses or justifications,91Ƶ he deadpanned.
He said common 91Ƶdragons91Ƶ include: 91ƵI91Ƶm only one person. Why should I do anything if my efforts don91Ƶt make a difference?91Ƶ and 91ƵIt91Ƶs the government91Ƶs job, not mine.91Ƶ
Environmental films are more likely to make a difference if they are quiet and serious, such as Al Gore91Ƶs 91ƵAn Inconvenient Truth,91Ƶ as opposed to over-the-top Hollywood fare that will just make viewers roll their eyes, Gifford said.
The most important factor in persuading people to care about climate change, however, is to demonstrate how it intersects with an issue they care about, such as their health, children or local community, he added.
91ƵThere is no magic message for everybody.91Ƶ
Laura Kane, The Canadian Press
Like us on and follow us on