By Rochelle Baker, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter CANADA91ƵS NATIONAL OBSERVER
Environmental groups aren91Ƶt the only ones characterizing Canada91Ƶs recent draft Ocean Noise Strategy as weak and watered down. The same criticism came from inside the department.
Key Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) staff were unimpressed with the proposed framework to address the surging problem of noise pollution, internal communications obtained by Canada91Ƶs National Observer suggest.
When the draft strategy rolled out in August, three years after its delivery was promised, it was highly criticized. Environmental groups and scientists said the plan lacked any immediate, meaningful actions to deal with the problem, such as noise-reduction targets for excessively noisy areas or noise pollution limits for industrial activities like shipping.
During the strategy91Ƶs internal review process, the DFO deputy minister91Ƶs office also forwarded comments from the Pacific Regional Office about the document91Ƶs weaknesses, according to emails obtained through access-to-information legislation.
One email observed that 91Ƶthere is only one actual noise management or reduction measure within the entire strategy,91Ƶ and questioned whether it should be called a 91Ƶstrategy91Ƶ at all.
91ƵThis framework must have been a long time underway, but it is really light on actual strategy 91Ƶ ie a plan that leads to an end,91Ƶ the email stated.
91ƵIf this is to be a Strategy, there should actually be some more items in here or plans for more items,91Ƶ the email said, adding that the draft strategy lacked direction, seemed to be largely focused on doing more research 91Ƶ and perhaps, merited a title change.
Despite the criticism, the strategy was approved unaltered, the email chain suggests. In a response sent after publication deadline, DFO confirmed the draft strategy wasn91Ƶt adapted despite staff comments about the lack of noise reduction pathways.
The internal government documents also noted the final strategy and action plan does not include any new funding.
In other documents, staff expressed concern the strategy would still attract negative comments from industries, including fish harvesters, shipping associations and seismic operators. The emails show the ministry91Ƶs media communication plan sought to reassure industry that the strategy did not include any new regulations to accomplish a reduction in noise.
91ƵEmphasis will be placed on the coordination and planning aspects of the Strategy to help alleviate any perceived ties to prescriptive management measures,91Ƶ various government emails noted.
The draft ocean noise strategy lays out 20 recommendations associated with three broad topic areas: science and knowledge-gathering assessment and management and communication, coordination and engagement.
There are no new suggested goals, objectives or new reduction targets to address noise pollution in the marine environment, despite the fact that industries, like the shipping and fishing sectors, Indigenous partners, research and environmental organizations were asked to provide input before the draft strategy was developed.
Released Aug. 23, the draft strategy has undergone another 60-day consultation period for feedback from the public and interested groups. The federal government is now using that information to shape an action plan and final strategy due sometime in 2025.
Questioned if either pending document will include new noise pollution measures, DFO replied the strategy is a policy framework that doesn91Ƶt mandate new regulations or targets, adding the strategy doesn91Ƶt preclude individual measures to address ocean noise.
However, the ministry didn91Ƶt confirm or clarify what, if any, individual noise pollution measures are under consideration or in development.
The strategy also doesn91Ƶt identify or prioritize any specific marine industry or sectors for action or attention 91Ƶas the policy is intended to be inclusive of all human sources of ocean noise,91Ƶ the email said.
Far from committing to new measures, DFO instead said the strategy 91Ƶdoes not prevent the possibility91Ƶ of including further noise reduction tools in the federal action plan.
Hussein Alidina, WWF-Canada91Ƶs lead specialist for marine conservation, noted the group has repeatedly told DFO that a strategy needs to chart a clear path with timelines to reduce underwater noise and manage its harms to marine life.
91ƵIt was clear when this strategy was released that it was more of a plan for a plan,91Ƶ Alidina said.
There should also be regional plans for hot spots of excessive noise, such as the Salish Sea and the St. Lawrence Estuary, where endangered southern resident killer whales and belugas reside and are exposed to unsustainable and harmful levels of sound pollution, Alidina said.
91ƵIt91Ƶs 100 times louder than it would be naturally in the Salish Sea, and we know we have to act to reduce that.91Ƶ
Acoustic smog from large ships, fishing boats, tugs, recreational vessels and ferries all hinder threatened orcas and other marine life91Ƶs ability to communicate with young, capture food and find mates.
Noise pollution will also disrupt formerly silent spaces along the coast of northern B.C. and the Arctic Ocean, where increased vessel traffic is expected as LNG export facilities come online on the West Coast, and with increased mining and commercial fishing activity in the North as ice retreats with global warming.
Some noise-mitigation measures already in place 91Ƶ like the Port of Vancouver91Ƶs ECHO Program 91Ƶ are beneficial, but they are temporary and don91Ƶt reduce noise enough to protect vulnerable species and other marine life, said Lance Barrett-Lennard, Raincoast Foundation91Ƶs whale conservation research director.
The port91Ƶs program involves voluntary, seasonal measures, such as the rerouting and slowdown of commercial vessels, to reduce physical and noise disturbance to southern residents with a current population of 73. The threatened whales recently suffered the death of a calf whose mother carried its corpse around on her head in an apparent show of mourning.
Compliance with the port91Ƶs voluntary slowdowns and route changes is high, but the program doesn91Ƶt address rising noise pollution tied to increased shipping associated with the Roberts Bank Terminal 2 and Trans Mountain Pipeline expansion projects, Barrett-Lennard said.
A carrot-and-stick approach is needed by the federal government to reward ships and companies that reduce noise and penalize the worst offenders, he said.
91ƵI91Ƶd like to see the ocean noise strategy work toward a system to identify and restrict exceptionally noisy vessels,91Ƶ Barrett-Lennard said.
91ƵThe general rule of thumb in my field is that 20 per cent of the vessels produce 80 per cent of the noise.91Ƶ
There is biological and political urgency for the federal government to put in place effective noise-reduction measures and an emergency order to protect endangered southern resident killer whales, Barrett-Lennard said.
Effective measures need to be set up rapidly given the Liberal government91Ƶs recent implosion, he added.
91ƵThe new government is less likely to put anything meaningful in place if the election goes the way we all think it will,91Ƶ Barrett-Lennard said.
91ƵThis is the time for the existing government to create a bit of a legacy for itself, draw a line in the sand and say, `We91Ƶve made progress on this issue,91Ƶ instead of kicking the can down the road.91Ƶ
91Ƶwith files from Jimmy Thomson