A B.C. city91Ƶs victory in a human rights complaint over a rainbow flag cost just over $62,000.
After the flag flew at Langley City hall to mark Pride Week, conservative and anti-SOGI Langley activist Kari Simpson went to the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal in 2018 to argue the banner 91Ƶpanders to sex activism, bully tactics, child abuse and special rights for certain groups.91Ƶ
In response, the City hired the law firm of Norton Rose Fulbright to defend the matter at a B.C. Human Rights Tribunal hearing.
A report to council filed on Sept. 30 by Chief Administrative Officer Francis Cheung described the process as 91Ƶlengthy and involved.91Ƶ
91ƵWhile the City was successful in defending itself against the complaint, the effort and time required by the City91Ƶs solicitor to prepare and submit evidence was considerable, resulting in legal costs totalling $62,058.05,91Ƶ Cheung wrote.
READ ALSO:
Unlike a court case, where a successful applicant can apply to have the other party or parties pay a portion of their legal costs, at a Humans Right hearing costs are less likely to be awarded, with the Human Rights Code saying they can be ordered when a party 91Ƶhas engaged in improper conduct during the course of the complaint.91Ƶ
When the City rejected Simpson91Ƶs complaint about the Pride flag, she asked to fly what she called the 91ƵCanadian Christian Flag91Ƶ on what she termed the 91ƵNational Day of Blessing.91Ƶ
Simpson identified herself as the 91Ƶhead organizer for the Langley Christian Flag committee and the organizer for the National Day of Blessings91Ƶ when she launched her complaint to the tribunal.
READ ALSO:
91ƵAccording to publicly available information filed by the City, the City says that Ms. Simpson appears to be the creator of the 91ƵNational Day of Blessings91Ƶ and the 91ƵCanadian Christian flag91Ƶ and Oct. 1, 2018 appears to be the first time that Ms. Simpson celebrated this day and flag,91Ƶ the tribunal91Ƶs judgment said. 91ƵMs. Simpson does not dispute this.91Ƶ
Simpson held a rally outside City hall at which the flag was displayed, but it was not raised on a City flagpole.
In April, the tribunal .
There was no evidence of any danger to her life, or of how the City might have incited 91Ƶcontempt and hatred for Christians91Ƶ as she claimed, the ruling stated.
It went on to point out the long history of discrimination against LGBTQ+ people.
91ƵPride celebrations help to counteract the historical discrimination committed against LGBTQ+ communities and help to bring those communities from a position of disadvantage to a more equal standing with heterosexual and cisgendered individuals who have historically enjoyed societal acceptance,91Ƶ the ruling said. 91ƵThe act of flying the Rainbow Flag also serves a similar purpose.91Ƶ
dan.ferguson@langleyadvancetimes.com
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter