Surrey Mayor Brenda Locke says she refuses to take marching orders from a bureaucrat in Victoria after the province91Ƶs director of police services fired off a 91Ƶrude91Ƶ letter to her on Oct. 4 protesting that a lack of leadership and engagement at Surrey City Hall is causing concerning delays to the city91Ƶs policing transition.
91ƵThe letter was disappointing but it91Ƶs inaccurate and it91Ƶs obviously trying to point blame but it91Ƶs completely inaccurate, his statements are completely inaccurate, he doesn91Ƶt know the picture on the ground and I guess the other piece is I have no idea why Glen Lewis would be writing me,91Ƶ Locke told the Now-Leader Tuesday (Oct. 10).
91ƵHe91Ƶs a bureaucrat, he should be writing bureaucrats. If the minister wants to say something to us he91Ƶs welcome to say something but it91Ƶs a little off protocol for a bureaucrat to be writing.91Ƶ
Assistant Deputy Minister Glen Lewis in his Oct. 4 letter to Locke lists 91Ƶsignificant91Ƶ work that has been taken at senior levels of government since the city was advised in July that it must continue its transition to the Surrey Police Service, but says little has been done at the municipal level.
91ƵIt is my observation that this lack of progress and delay is due in large part to a lack of leadership and engagement by City Council and City staff,91Ƶ Lewis, also director of police services, writes.
91ƵIn my view, City staff have been only minimally engaged in select aspects of this work to date and are seemingly constrained by a lack of clear direction from the Mayor and Council to progress the transition.91Ƶ
City staff 91Ƶconsistently state to its partners that they are instructed not to engage meaningfully in any work91Ƶ on the transition until council directs them to, Lewis adds.
Lewis in his letter to Locke writes 91ƵI strongly urge that the City rectify these matters forthwith and assume the leadership required to carry out its transition. To this end, I request a report back on the remedy of these items, in writing, from the City by the end of business day, October 13, 2023.91Ƶ
This rankles Locke. 91ƵHe picks a short week, first of all, so he gives us basically five business days to respond to something that91Ƶd they91Ƶve taken literally almost, what, eight, nine months to come to a conclusion on,91Ƶ she replied. 91ƵI think it91Ƶs rude and as I said, he91Ƶs a bureaucrat, he91Ƶs not going to instruct the mayor of a city what to do. I91Ƶm certainly not going to jump for a bureaucrat in Victoria.91Ƶ
Last month, following questions to SPS Chief Constable Norm Lipinski and Surrey RCMP Assistant Commissioner Brian Edwards, Locke said the 91Ƶleadership ball91Ƶ was in the province91Ƶs court and that the province 91Ƶneeds to make sure91Ƶ that there is a path forward.91Ƶ
READ MORE:
91ƵThis council has done everything asked of us and within our authority to follow through on our obligation to determine the policing model for our city,91Ƶ Locke said at the time. 91ƵMuch of the issues that we are dealing with are provincial and federal issues and that has become a lot of the stall.91Ƶ
A corporate report that came before council Sept. 11 concluded that although Public Safety Minister Mike Farnworth had directed Surrey to forge ahead with the SPS, 91Ƶoutstanding challenges remain91Ƶ and development of a 91Ƶcomprehensive framework and planning documents is necessary for any transition to SPS.91Ƶ
Farnworth ordered city council on July 19, 2023 to carry on with the transition to the SPS from the Surrey RCMP, despite council having voted 5-4 in November 2022 to maintain the Mounties as the city91Ƶs police of jurisdiction.
READ MORE:
Locke and her Surrey Connect five-member majority campaigned on keeping the RCMP.
Other claims Lewis made in his letter include:
91Ƶ Cost-increase concerns expressed by Locke to Premier David Eby 91Ƶmay be inaccurate and/or misrepresented.91Ƶ
91Ƶ The city failed to rectify its budget for the SPS following Farnworth91Ƶs July decision (in March 2023, the city allocated just $49 million to the first two quarters of the fiscal year, despite a 2023 provisional budget of approximately $160 million submitted by the Surrey Police Board last fall).
91Ƶ While Locke has 91Ƶstated publicly to the media91Ƶ that she had no input on formal terms of reference for the independent facilitator who was appointed to help facilitate the transition process, as of the letter91Ƶs date, she did not take opportunities that were provided to do so.
READ MORE:
Meantime, Surrey First Coun. Linda Annis issued a press release Oct. 6 suggesting Lewis91Ƶs letter also reinforces that 91Ƶpolitical ego91Ƶ is playing a role in stalling the policing transition.
91ƵClearly, just like local taxpayers, the provincial government has had enough of the political foot dragging from Mayor Locke,91Ƶ Annis says, noting the inaction is costing taxpayers an extra $8 million per month, through having to pay for two police forces at the same time.
91ƵThe decision to move forward with the transition to the SPS has been made, and regardless of how Brenda Locke feels about it, she has a responsibility to get on with it. Instead, we are seeing a serious and calculated lack of progress that has its roots in political ego rather than doing what91Ƶs good for Surrey.91Ƶ
Also last week, Safe Surrey Coalition councillors Doug Elford and Mandeep Nagra issued a press release attacking Locke.
91ƵMayor Locke91Ƶs leadership has been marred by inaction and a lack of clear direction. We can no longer accept excuses for the delays she has caused. It91Ƶs time for her to step up or step aside,91Ƶ Elford says.
Nagra echoed him.
91ƵWe understand the complexities of the transition, but Mayor Locke91Ƶs shocking refusal to meet with Public Safety staff to discuss Minister Mike Farnworth91Ƶs offer of $150 million in provincial cash to help with the transition is inexcusable,91Ƶ Nagra charged.
In reply to Annis, Elford and Nagra, Locke said the 91Ƶlevel of disrespect they have shown towards not only me but to council is enormous but I91Ƶm not going to respond to their comments, it91Ƶs all just political. I wish they spent more time trying to be ambassadors for this city, not constantly acting the way they do, but they choose to.91Ƶ
Meanwhile, Surrey Board of Trade CEO Anita Huberman sent a letter to Farnworth on Oct. 4 concerning local businesses being saddled with a bigger tax bill in 2024 on account of two police forces operating in the city with no second-phase plan for replacing the Surrey RCMP with the Surrey Police Service.
Huberman also charged that since Jessica MacDonald was appointed as the liaison between the Provincial Government and the City of Surrey in the summer, 91Ƶno public comments or materials have been released highlighting the work done thus far. We are deeply concerned with the lack of transparency and communication.91Ƶ
On that, Locke said she last met with MacDonald in August. 91ƵI believe she91Ƶs talked with some of the staff here but she hasn91Ƶt provided us with, at least that I know of, anything concrete so I91Ƶm not sure, but I do understand what the Surrey Board of Trade and Anita is talking about, and I91Ƶm concerned about it too. There is no question that the predicament that the minister has put the City of Surrey in is a very, very costly one and he may be doing it for the balance of the province, but for the City of Surrey, his decision is going to cost our residents significantly and all our taxpayers, including our business community.91Ƶ
Locke has on occasion complained that Farnworth isn91Ƶt contacting her personally. She said she last received a letter from him in mid-September. 91ƵHe91Ƶs finally admitting he doesn91Ƶt have a plan so fair enough, but somehow he wants us to create the plan and that91Ƶs difficult,91Ƶ Locke said Oct. 10.
91ƵI find it interesting they had been saying well there is a plan, we kept talking about it and now he91Ƶs saying there isn91Ƶt a plan, we need you to create the plan. Well, we have a plan 91Ƶ our plan was to keep the RCMP and he said our vision isn91Ƶt his vision so he needs to share his vision.
91ƵIt seems to me Victoria has a pretty tough time picking up the phone,91Ƶ Locke said. 91ƵI don91Ƶt know why they don91Ƶt have the courtesy of talking to a duly elected mayor and council. I don91Ƶt understand it. It91Ƶs surprising, the behaviour is very surprising.91Ƶ
91Ƶ with files from Tracy Holmes.