A UBC Okanagan arts professor believes the concept of free speech is not being shared by his faculty brethren.
Peter Wylie is candidate for an executive committee of the UBC Faculty Association, which is comprised of faculty at both the Kelowna and Point Grey UBC campuses. He issued a critical analysis of the association91Ƶs actions.
That analysis elicited a rebuke from the present UBCFA executive, calling Wylie91Ƶs analysis as false and unfounded, saying it constitutes 91Ƶbullying and harassment against our staff.91Ƶ
As a result, Wylie has been blocked access to the email contact list for the faculty members, which some of Wylie91Ƶs faculty co-members feels undermines the legitimacy of the executive election process.
91ƵI find this advisory from your committee to be extremely disappointing and disreputable,91Ƶ said Wylie.
READ ALSO: HAS UBC OKANAGAN FAILED STUDENTS?
Wayne Ross and Paul Quirk, Vancouver campus professors, publicly reprimanded the UBCFA executive committee for directly undermining Wylie91Ƶs candidacy.
91ƵWhether or not the allegations of Dr. Wylie91Ƶs report are accurate, this response seems to confirm that the UBCFA is actively working against him,91Ƶ Ross said.
91ƵInstead of addressing his criticisms substantively, the association hides behind a bogus charge that he is harassing the staff. In fact, Wylie describes conduct of a few staff members91Ƶwithout mentioning their names91Ƶto substantiate his claim that the association has failed to support the Okanagan faculty.
91ƵThe charge of harassment is an attack on Dr. Wylie91Ƶs freedom of expression.91Ƶ
Repeated efforts by the Kelowna Capital News, including emailing questions related to Wylie91Ƶs candidacy issues to the UBCFA office in Vancouver failed to generate a response.
UBCFA vice-president Vinayak Vatsal said he would attempt to get the submitted questions answered, but noted no one on the executive may want to make a comment, and he didn91Ƶt have authority himself to respond.
Wylie91Ƶs accusations stem from what he claims was 91Ƶacademic mobbing91Ƶ of him by the UBCFA and UBCO senior administration and of a sweetheart unionism deal going on that both the faculty association and university don91Ƶt want disrupted, which Wylie claims is to the detriment of UBCO faculty members.
Wylie stated in his analysis91Ƶa 31-page document that presents a case-by-case accounting of his interactions with the UBCFA as a professor and member of the association91Ƶs faculty committee and member services grievance committee91Ƶthis detriment has played out through consolidating power to staff, drawing out legitimate grievances until they91Ƶre dropped, and acting in UBC administration91Ƶs interests over the faculty they91Ƶre supposed to represent.
Because UBCO91Ƶs faculty make up small proportion of the UBCFA membership, Wylie says their grievances and workplace complaints get left in 91Ƶa quagmire and quicksand of collusion and complicity.91Ƶ
It91Ƶs a large part why Wylie is part of a group of 20 UBCO faculty who organized for eight candidates to run in the UBCFA executive election.
Wylie says the core of the lack of representation argument began when UBC Okanagan was created by the provincial government.
Some faculty from Okanagan University College and new faculty professors were adopted into the existing UBCFA rather than forming their own association, the result being their collective influence has been drowned out by their Point Grey campus counterparts.
The current furor, Wylie says, has been caused by the UBCFA hiding behind the ideal of the university being a respectful environment where bullying and harassment is not considered appropriate behaviour.
91ƵSo they are saying to me that offering criticism is considered being disrespectful. That is clearly dampening on our freedom of expression. Criticism is not bullying or harassment. It is freedom of speech,91Ƶ Wylie said.
To report a typo, email: edit@kelownacapnews.com.
<>
barry.gerding@blackpress.ca
Like us on and follow us on .