There were a few unhappy councillors at the end of Monday91Ƶs (Apr.22) meeting following a failed attempt to reconsider pay raises voted on and passed a week ago.
Councillor Ron Cannan made the motion to reconsider which was supported by Coun. Mohini Singh.
91ƵCan we ask for greater clarity on why, we make so many decisions day in and day out, we need to reconsider this decision?91Ƶ asked Mayor Tom Dyas.
Cannan pointed out that he made a request at the end of last week91Ƶs (Apr. 15) meeting that he wanted to be on the record as opposed to adopting the remuneration bylaw.
Dyas asked Cannan why he had a change of heart.
91ƵThere wasn91Ƶt,91Ƶ Cannan replied. 91ƵI missed the vote it was my mistake. I waited until the end of the meeting so as not to disrupt proceedings91ƵI asked to be on the record as being opposed. I was told I can91Ƶt because our council procedure bylaws require it to come back for reconsideration.91Ƶ
City clerk Laura Bentley confirmed that 91Ƶcouncil may put forward a motion to reconsider a decision already made.91Ƶ
READ MORE: Kelowna council still divided over pay increase
During the Apr. 15 meeting, an item before the remuneration bylaw was removed from the agenda, which appeared to confuse some councillors as to which matter they were voting on.
91ƵI made a mistake,91Ƶ admitted Coun. Rick Webber regarding the deleted item. 91ƵIt had been taken off the agenda kind of on the fly and I hadn91Ƶt caught on to that, I was distracted.91Ƶ
Webber said by the end of that meeting he wondered if council actually voted on remuneration. 91ƵI had to go back and look at the tapes and saw indeed we did vote, and we all voted yes. It was later I realized I voted on the wrong thing.91Ƶ
Although, Webber added he did not see a need to reconsider the matter as the result is not likely to change.
Councillors Singh and Gord Lovegrove said they made similar mistakes. Singh said previously that she is not opposed to a raise, just the amount.
91ƵI would like to see my vote documented as being against it, but I don91Ƶt have a big problem with it.91Ƶ
Lovegrove said he and his colleagues voted on something they missed.
91ƵWe were distracted, whatever words you want to use. Reconsideration could overturn that bylaw and that91Ƶs not where I91Ƶm going with supporting this motion.91Ƶ
Coun. Loyal Wooldridge said that revisiting the decision would set a dangerous precedent.
91ƵIt is incumbent on us to be paying attention to the agenda and the clerk does a great job of ensuring where we are at in the agenda.91Ƶ
Lovegrove attempted to make a motion, citing a parliamentary rule that would allow council (with 75 per cent support) to amend the minutes of the Apr. 15 meeting to reflect the non-support of the four councillors.
Dyas didn91Ƶt allow that, prompting Cannan to call for a point of order and ask the city clerk if that was a possibility. Bentley noted that the minutes had already been adopted by council.
91ƵThe minutes reflect what transpired in the meeting91Ƶit91Ƶs not practice to amend them after the fact.91Ƶ
Dyas said in reviewing the video of the Apr. 15 meeting it was clear to him how councillors voted.
91ƵI do not want to get into a practice of turning around and revisiting decisions especially when we91Ƶre dealing with major developments and if something gets into a 5-4 vote and want to change our vote at the end of a meeting I don91Ƶt want to set that precedent.91Ƶ
Council voted down Cannan91Ƶs motion.
READ MORE: Evacuated apartments residents demand solutions from UBC, City of Kelowna
READ MORE: Dead man found near Big White investigated as homicide: RCMP